Hi there, I’m Brie! I’m a product marketing consultant and portfolio career coach. I write about business, technology, and culture and our changing relationship with work. Follow along for more musings about the future of work and what not!
In 1930, economist John Maynard Keynes made one of the boldest predictions of the century.
By 2030, he wrote, technological progress would be so profound that we'd only need to work 15 hours a week to maintain a comfortable standard of living. The rest of our time? We'd spend it discovering "how to occupy the leisure, which science and compound interest will have won for us."
Nearly a century later, Keynes looks both eerily prescient and profoundly wrong.
He nailed the math, sure. U.S. GDP per capita has increased nearly fivefold since 1930. Productivity has surged. Automation and digital infrastructure have slashed the labor needed to meet basic needs.
But we're still clocking in at 40-plus hours a week for our wage work. Still measuring our worth by our output. Still sprinting for our livelihoods and burning ourselves out while AI learns how to do our jobs faster.
Keynes was right about abundance, no doubt. What he missed was everything that determines how humans actually live and work.
The Abundance Trap
Keynes built his forecast on a single assumption: once material needs were met, people would choose leisure over labor.
But we didn't optimize for comfort over the course of the last one hundred years. We ruthlessly pursued status.
Keynes also assumed economic gains would be shared. They weren't. Since the 1970s, productivity has continued to rise, but wages have stagnated. Labor's share of wealth continues to shrink while corporate profits soar and inequality widens.
He saw factories getting faster and assumed all labor would scale the same way. But knowledge work, caregiving, design, therapy, and teaching don't scale like steel production. You can't double a therapist's output by automating their work or doubling their hours. It doesn't work the same.
Keynes wasn't wrong about what abundance would make possible. He was just wrong about who would get to benefit from that abundance.
Here's what actually happened: We achieved the economic miracle he predicted. Then a handful of institutions and people captured all the reward.
The productivity gains Keynes predicted? They materialized exactly on schedule. But instead of shorter workweeks, we got longer ones. Instead of shared prosperity, we got winner-take-all markets. Instead of liberation from economic anxiety, we got the gig economy and "hustle culture".
I remember once someone telling me that a portfolio career was a lifestyle choice. I completely disagree. I think they are both a market correction and a form of conscientious objection.
When institutions refuse to share the abundance, individuals create their own. When corporations won't offer meaningful work, professionals will build it for themselves. When the traditional career path becomes rigged, smart people will stop playing by those rules.
This isn't about work-life balance or following your passion. It's about economic logic. In an abundant world, why would you limit your value creation to a single channel controlled by someone else? Why would you accept artificial scarcity when you can tap into the abundance of life that is already available to you?
The math is simple: diversify your professional risk, capture more of the value you create, and design work around your actual capabilities instead of someone company’s org chart.
Keynes predicted that abundance would free us from "pressing economic cares." He was right. What he didn't anticipate was that we'd have to free ourselves.
Real Liberation Exists Beyond Economics
The future of work is not about working less as Keynes predicted.
It's about working differently. It's about moving from hierarchy to networks, from institutional dependency to creative ownership. From ladder climbing to multidimensional building.
Keynes predicted abundance would liberate us from the struggle to survive. He was right. But real liberation requires more than economics. It requires a reimagining of how we organize human capability: how we structure our careers, our ambitions, and our contributions to the world.
The real question isn't whether we'll work 15 hours a week by 2030.
The real question is whether we will have the courage to organize our professional lives around what actually matters to us instead of what corporate structures have historically demanded from us.
Because the answer to Keynes' question isn't leisure.
It's professional sovereignty in an age of abundance.
↓ If this feels like the beginning of a longer conversation ↓
Are you Portfolio Career Curious?
Watch my FREE pre-recorded Youtube webinar.
I get into what the heck a portfolio career is, why everyone seems to be drawn to them these days, and some tips for how to go about building one yourself!
Ready to parachute off the corporate ladder faster than you can say let’s circle back?
Book a 1-on-1 coaching session and/or check out my website to learn about the various ways you can work and/or collaborate with me in the New Year!